Be heard on the issues that matter most to you!
Max Mosely, head of Formula One racing, won his privacy suit against the British tabloid "News Of The World." The New York Times reports:
The judge, Sir David Eady, awarded Mr. Mosley, 68, damages equivalent to about $120,000 and legal costs estimated to be at least $850,000 in his lawsuit against The News of the World.
Question: Because this was a lawsuit it had to be framed in terms of a legal question, hence the focus on "press freedom" v. "individual privacy", but wouldn't this kind of thing be better discussed in terms of journalistic ethics? Instead of worrying about whether this decision represents a limiting of freedom of the British press, should the British press be discussing ways to make sure its members adhere to ethical reporting standards?
I'm all for investigative journalism, but there has to be something in the public interest to justify it. Exposing a person's private, legal, consensual sexual activity is certainly not in the public interest. It may be very interesting to the public, but that's not the same thing!
Previous coverage of the Mosely case in the New York Times
...because public space really matters!
Elizabeth
this story has been all over the british press to the point we have heard (over our morning cuppa tea) the details of mr mosleys party
i do not support this sort of journalism...it's all about sensationalism...selling headlines.
funny that now the woman who filmed the scene is apologizing
my lesson learned? no cameras!!!
Once again, one notices a certain prurient interest in that only one sex worker was described in terms of her other ocupation, and that was as a doctoral student. Does one preclude the other?
