Home
  • About us
  • Calendar
  • THE PUBLIC SQUARE
  • Links
  • Search

Navigation

  • Track sex-related legislation (Safari-only right now)
  • Recent activity
  • Add Something New!

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

SPEAK OUT!!

Contact the Media

Be heard on the issues that matter most to you!

Our Feeds...

 Whole Site Feed

 Calendar Feed

 Comments Feed

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 3 guests online.
Home ยป Why the Mormons (and other churches) are wrong about their support of the CA ballot initiative to restrict

Why the Mormons (and other churches) are wrong about their support of the CA ballot initiative to restrict

  • California
  • Marriage
  • Mormons
  • religion
  • same-sex marriage
Submitted by Elizabeth on 25 June 2008 - 4:20am.

LDS Tabernacle in Salt Lake City The Mormon church has asked its members to support the California ballot initiative that would amend the state's constitution to define marriage as a relationship between one man and one woman. Specifically, according to the Associated Press:

"We ask that you do all you can to support the proposed constitutional amendment by donating of your means and time to ensure that marriage in California is legally defined as being between a man and a woman," church leaders say in the letter. "Our best efforts are required to preserve the sacred institution of marriage."

They should rethink that strategy and their own writings explain why: The LDS church claims, in a letter signed by the LDS president, that:

"The church's teachings and position on this moral issue are unequivocal. Marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and the formation of families is central to the Creator's plan for His children."

That is exactly true. The church's teachings are unequivocal. And the church should be allowed to keep its teachings free from interference by the state, which is a civil institution and which affords civil rights, not religious rights.

Likewise it is ill-served by efforts to interfere with the civil rights afforded by the state.

Put plainly, if it wins its misguided effort to enshrine its own religious principles in a state constitution it should be prepared for another religion to successfully replace those principles with new ones in the future.

Far better for churches to keep civil and religious rights separate. No matter how strongly they despise values that might be enshrined in civil law, civil law and religious law are separate, much to the benefit (for those who believe) of religious law. If civil law and religious law were too intimately connected, churches would be vulnerable not only to changes in secular beliefs but also to majority religious beliefs. Certainly the Mormons understand how this could be dangerous.

It is rare that I argue this, but certainly this is a case of religious institutions needing to look out for their own self interests. Imposing assimilation to their own values is not going to serve their needs in the long run.

(It is comforting that some churches seem to recognize this and have organized in support of basic civil rights, including the right to equal marriage. Those churches rightly recognize that without protection of basic civil rights their own rights are deeply threatened.)

Episcopals in MA supporting equal marriage Young Progressive Jews support marriage equality

Photos all licensed under creative commons licenses. Licenses and Attributions:

  • Mormon Tabernacle by Travis S .
  • Episcopal Diocese supporting marriage equality in MA by Philocrites
  • Young Progressive Jews Support Equal Marraige by Jewish Women's Archive

__________________________

...because public space really matters!

Elizabeth

»
  • Elizabeth's blog
  • Add new comment
  • Read more

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br /> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

This site powered by Drupal!


Unless otherwise marked, work on SexInThePublicSquare.org work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. Permission required for commercial uses.

Header image created by Jolene Collins using works that are public domain or licensed under Creative Commons Attribution, Noncommercial, Share-alike licenses. From left to right, images are credited to: Will Van Dorp, unknown origin found on Pawel Wojcik's "Grandfather's Girls", Richard Eriksson, Kaitlyn Tikkun. Background image by Robert Gourley