Sex In The Public Square - New signature module - Comments

I thought I needed a sexier signature....

Elizabeth — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:20:12 -0700

but that wasn't quite what I had in mind.

Now, go hang out naked in the park and then report back on how it went!

OOOO!

JanieBelle — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:16:57 -0700

and you should remove the first 'l' from your siggy.

...because pubic space really matters!

JanieBelle

JanieBelle — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:15:33 -0700

... hangs her head in abject shame.

I'll have to go to the park downtown and get naked or something now to make up for it.

I think...

JanieBelle — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:14:05 -0700

I know what happened. I had begun to comment, and the old module put the siggy in the comment box. I think I mentioned before that it was kind of annoying and that most forums it was invisible in the comment editor and then appended to the comment later.

Anyways, I think you changed modules whilst I was commenting, and so the new module appended the siggy to the old comment which already had the siggy in it.

I'll bet it's fine from here out.

We must be pretty geeky

Elizabeth — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:12:25 -0700

If on a sex discussion site the most popular forum by far is about signature files ;)

Man,

JanieBelle — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:08:38 -0700

was I confused there for a sec... Let's see if this double posts. the siggy.

double signatures on old posts only, I think

Elizabeth — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:06:35 -0700

Okay, so I think that there are duplicate signatures on old posts, but not on anything starting from now. Lets keep track of that!

then again maybe they aren't

Elizabeth — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:05:22 -0700

No duplicate signature on that forum topic post ... will there be one here?

New signature module

Elizabeth — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:04:30 -0700

I've added a new signature module, and I think I did it just as JanieBelle was making some kind of new change of her own. In any case, I'm afraid now that signatures are showing up twice. Is that happening to others?