<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Sex In The Public Square - The Female Condom Gets a Makeover - Comments</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/487</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;The Female Condom Gets a Makeover&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Condom Follow-Up</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/487#comment-901</link>
 <description>I&#039;d love to hear your follow-up. I know that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wakingvixen.com/archives/000633.html target=&quot;new&quot;&gt;Audacia&lt;/a&gt; really appreciated the original model, and I&#039;ve known quite a few women who loved it, but that&#039;s far from being a universal consensus. I think that no matter what they do to the design, the whole thing is doomed unless they can bring down the price significantly.</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:59:21 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 901 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I will have to do a</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/487#comment-900</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I will have to do a follow-up podcast about this! Rusty and I did a podcast last year where we tested the female condom, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gapodcastnetwork.com/network-programs/mostly-itp/2006/12/09/testing-the-female-condom&quot;&gt;with not so great results&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:20:58 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Amber Rhea</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 900 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Female Condom Gets a Makeover</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/487</link>
 <description>The female condom has kind of been like the Betamax of safer sex.  Despite its debut being heralded with a lot of hype and hopes, it never caught on, either in the United States or elsewhere.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/13/health/13cond.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ref=health&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot; id=&quot;agdt&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Now the makers have redesigned it&quot;&gt;Now the makers have redesigned it&lt;/a&gt;, hoping that it&amp;#39;ll live up to its potential the second time around.  I do know women who like the female condom: at least two have told me that they didn&amp;#39;t like using it unless they were serious about a guy, because it felt much more intimate than a regular condom.  But no matter what they do with the shape and design, I don&amp;#39;t think that the female condom&amp;#39;s ever going to become competitive unless they can do something about the price, which has always been up around $4 per female condom as opposed to .50 to $1.00 for the old-fashioned kind.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/487&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/487#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/378">condoms</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/134">contraception</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/quickies">quickies</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/795">safer sex</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/545">women&amp;#039;s health</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:00:35 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">487 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
