<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Sex In The Public Square - Califorinia - Comments</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/1045</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Califorinia&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Marriage in California</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/670#comment-2851</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Same sex marriages have now been legal in California for a full week. How is it going out there? Is the ballot-initiative work slowing down or speeding up? What kind of grass roots or online organizing is needed to make sure that it fails and marriage stays legal?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:31:18 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2851 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I understand your nervousness...</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/670#comment-2382</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m sorry to have missed this comment when it was first posted. It&amp;#39;s been kind of crazy around here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I totally understand your nervousness. I think the fact that it only takes a simply majority on a ballot initiative to amend the constitution is grounds for great nervousness. On the other hand, I suppose it is also grounds for some amount of optimism. Technically, I suppose, it means that the constitution can be amended very frequently should people decide to organize for change. Maybe this is a good reminder that people living in states with such simple amendment procedures should start combing through their constitutions for things that need changing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And in California specifically it means that those who want to see equality protected need to organize voters in large numbers. Let us know if we can be helfpful at &lt;em&gt;Sex In The Public Square&lt;/em&gt;. Unfortunately none of the site&amp;#39;s founders are able to vote in California, but we are prepared to help mobilize voters there, to be certain! And California is our second largest source of readers after New York. Let us know what you need. And we&amp;#39;ll keep following the story.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:38:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2382 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I&#039;m nervous</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/670#comment-2297</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The court decision is really exciting! I wasn&amp;#39;t in the Castro the evening it came down, but I hear it was a great party, a wonderful moment of community. It&amp;#39;s the kind of thing that warms my hippie little heart and makes me feel a part of a great big family.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But as I said in my subject line, I&amp;#39;m nervous. I know that the Religious Right are really good at getting out their voters, and they will play with people&amp;#39;s homophobia to get this ammendment passed. I&amp;#39;m worried that their tactics--which I think are lowbrow and hurtful but are nonetheless effective--might work to get California voters to put discrimination in our constitution. Which would obviously just be a shame. I love California, and I love living in San Francisco where people mostly have open minds. It would be so sad to see us pass something so...backwards. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 09:16:11 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>papercutsandplastic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2297 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
