Sex In The Public Square - Congress - Comments

Who gets to be President?

Bethany — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:38:13 -0700

"Will it be even longer before the vision of the 1868 Fouteenth Amendment of equality under the law for "all persons" is actually realised?"

Yes, Michael, I think it will.

Institutionalized sexism and racism, religious discrimination and discrimination based on sexual preference are still huge factors in who gets to be President of the U.S. and who does not. I refuse to deny that this exists. Barack Obama is the Democratic nominee, but look how long it took for a man of color to reach his position? It's taken 2 1/2 decades for another woman to finally be nominated for V.P. But even then, only certain women of certain backgrounds are considered. All other things considered equal, what are the chances that a lesbian, a woman who follows Islam or Buddhism, or any woman of color could be President of the U.S.? Not very good in my opinion, at least right now. So, who gets to have the power of what is considered to be the highest office in the world? Some of us clearly won't no matter how intelligent or good for the country we may be, because of our characteristics and preferences. We are still incredibly limited and prejudiced on what characteristics we will accept in a President and Vice President. We don't all have an equal chance of being President or V.P.

Passion, Reason, and Reality

Kelly — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:47:00 -0700

Passion, Reason, and Reality; an oxymoron in three parts.

I know the passion of the plea for equality. A thing so easily made into an inequality by our society. There has been the long standing principle of separate but equal in America. The principle is so ingrained that it is seen and not recognized. America the free is relegated to myth by so many inequalities. The entire issue of second class citizens, women, racial groups, lifestyle pursuasion, disabled, poor, fromer felons. The list can go on. Go on and still not change because passion is not an emotion of the group.

It is reasonable to believe that through our social contract, the Constitution and its amendments, equality exists in our society. It is reasonable to understand the blood letting of the Democratic Primary and Obama's challenge to Washington insiders precluded the selection of Clinton as the second class president running mate. It is reasonable to assume McCain chose Palin because she countered the insider image and reflected the values he holds. It is also reasonable to presume the Palin decision was a direct slap at the Democratic Party and an oppertunistic grab at disaffected Clinton supporters.

There is a reality. The first position I take is in regard to equality. I have a passion for equality. I learned as a child leading other children in Viet Nam that leadership is composed of the ability to inspire rahter than the ability to direct. That just as much as rank has no place in how a person dies, neither does gender. There is an essential difference between the genders and it is purely one of form, not function. I do not subscribe to different planetary orgins of the species.

I have a reason for who I will follow, who I will respect, to who I will aver. My reason is not based on gender, it is based on ability and inspiration. I am so fortunate. I am blind. Now that I don't see, I see so much more clearly. I wish the glass ceiling did not exist. I won't break it for the sake of principle. I simply won't accept those who maintain their superior position based on that glass ceiling as opposed to their ability.

I have a passion. James Simon Kunnan told us in The Strawberry Statement: Notes of a College Revolutionary that society, by it nature is reactionary. It moves forward very slowly. Without the radical, it would move backwards. That is my passion. To be the radical that stands on reason to gain equality for all. To move forward to a place where we do not need to speak of gender in terms other than those of form.

Urgent action needed, thank you Amber!

Elizabeth — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:44:47 -0800

I had meant to get a SexAct(ivism)! piece up about this but clearly there isn't time. I'm so glad you posted this. Of course we're looking forward to your original posts, too, but thank you for taking time away from that to post this call.

What's really pissin' me off

JanieBelle — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:07:42 -0800

Is their pussyfooting around. They got a clear mandate last year that this kind of crap should end.

The people spoke, and they said "enough".

Yet the Democrats seem to be playing this game of "we don't want to push too hard, too fast, and overstep". It's like they're afraid their popularity in the polls is so low because they've done too much fighting against the White House and His Holiness The Glorified Houseplant Who Would Be Caesar, when in fact their numbers are in the toilet because they're not doing enough!

Somebody beat them with the frakkin' cluestick, so we can get on with the criminal trials!

I would have inserted an "n" in "dam-ocrats"...

Elizabeth — Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:18:23 -0700

...because of how infuriating their actions are. They aren't just stopping up importantt things, they're increasing the flow of abhorrent things.

Call 'em "Dam-ocrats"...

will — Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:39:39 -0700

...for all their stopping up the flow of things!