Sex In The Public Square - international aid - Comments

Urgent action needed, thank you Amber!

Elizabeth — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:44:47 -0800

I had meant to get a SexAct(ivism)! piece up about this but clearly there isn't time. I'm so glad you posted this. Of course we're looking forward to your original posts, too, but thank you for taking time away from that to post this call.

Betrayal?

Chris — Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:34:54 -0700

I believe the word for which you may be reaching is "betrayal".

If I were feeling very, very polite, that would be the word I would grab for. Generally, my description of the situation would include a lot of very rude descriptions of anatomically impossible acts and speculations upon their lineage.

I'm Feeling It

JanieBelle — Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:17:48 -0700

Your pain, that is. I've been utterly discouraged by the (lack of) Democratic actions since they've taken control of the Congress.

They had a resounding mandate to fix things, but have pissed it away.

I believe the word for which you may be reaching is "betrayal".

Thank you

JanieBelle — Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:15:03 -0700

Yes, UDoJ is also under the CCNCSA license (with one small exception, noted at the bottom of the right hand side bar).

I was pretty sure you would be OK with it, and I just wanted to get your permission first.

Kisses

The Difficulties of Activism

Chris — Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:00:44 -0700

I must be getting old.

Activism like this gets harder and harder for me; much as my brain insists that actions like are necessary, and that I shouldn't surrender to the grip of apathy, it's harder to convince my heart that stuff like this will do anything. I don't think a veto is likely; I think it's certain, unless the Dems get together and make a real push that not only gets them a 2/3rds majority with which to overrrule the veto, but can stand up to the inevitable slanders that the Republicans will hit them with about how the Dems are a bunch of baby-killin' homos and whoremongers. Yeah, it's true that assaults like these are not only ironic but positively ludicrous in light of recent events, but they still work, partly because the Dems fear them so damn much. If more prominent Democrats, like say, Hillary Clinton, were willing to be unambiguous in their support for abortion rights as a good thing, I'd have more faith, but instead they spend their time pussyfooting around and try to triangulate a "third way" that will allow them to keep their base while not looking like they like this abortion thing too much.

In the end, the Republicans aren't the real enemy of liberals; it's the Democrats.

Of course you may

Elizabeth — Sat, 15 Sep 2007 16:36:00 -0700

That's the beauty of our Creative Commons "By Attribution, Non Commercial, Share Alike" license. UDOJ is still noncommercial, isn't it? Because otherwise you'd need special permission ;)

May I?

JanieBelle — Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:53:14 -0700

Elizabeth,

Thank you for the link love, for starters, and for posting this as well.

With your permission, I'd like to repost this in toto at UDoJ.

May I?