<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Sex In The Public Square - elections - Comments</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/880</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;elections&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Prop K defeated</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/753#comment-7205</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;KTVU, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/elections/local/Voters_Choose_Not_to_Legalize_Prostitution_in_San_Francisco.html&quot;&gt;KRON&lt;/a&gt; , and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/elections/local/Voters_Choose_Not_to_Legalize_Prostitution_in_San_Francisco.html&quot;&gt;Chronicle&lt;/a&gt;  have all reported Prop K&amp;#39;s defeat. I kind of expected it, since it was an uphill battle, especially since the SF political establishment was against it. And unfortunately, Kamilla Harris and her law&amp;#39;n&amp;#39;order approach is a lot more popular than the Terrence Hallinan&amp;#39;s more liberal/libertarian approach from a few years back.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Statewide, Prop 8 may pass. What the hell is the matter with California these days? &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:31:17 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Iamcuriousblue</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7205 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It does come off</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/ElizabethsBlog/I-read-it-for-the-pictures#comment-1099</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;as dismissive of both of them, but then the topic being discussed is of direct relevance to the groups depicted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, I&amp;#39;ve tentatively made my choice of presidential candidate (by process of elimination, unfortunately), and I think I can safely say that none of these types of (intentional or otherwise) subliminal messages has affected that decision.  It&amp;#39;s just not been a very close descision for me because of the blatant violation of my own particular deal-breakers that I already had in place. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve already posted (at UDoJ) that every one of the Republicans is right out (and why - including my list of deal-breakers).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ll be getting to the Democrats shortly. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:35:45 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JanieBelle</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1099 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Reminds me of boarding</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/ElizabethsBlog/I-read-it-for-the-pictures#comment-1046</link>
 <description>Reminds me of boarding school, where we were wheeled out as a rent-a-crowd for any school occasion. I&#039;ll bet that the New York Time photographer has about 20 other shots that can&#039;t be used because some of the students in them are asleep.</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 20:07:16 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1046 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Oprah is not to be dismissed....</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/ElizabethsBlog/I-read-it-for-the-pictures#comment-1045</link>
 <description>...and yet the NYT pairing of middle school boys and Sen. Obama, and high school cheerleaders with Sen. Clinton&amp;#39;s husband seems dismissive of both.   Is it clear which is more dismissive?</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:34:55 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1045 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> i&#039;m out of the loop</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/ElizabethsBlog/I-read-it-for-the-pictures#comment-1044</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;reading this is a reality check for me...i am familiar with the candidates and recognize the nuance..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; i think mrs clinton should be offended...why should attentive but non voting cheerleaders listening to her husband be a positive for her??&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;it&amp;#39;s so early in the race, i can&amp;#39;t imagine how many hairs will be split in the push to the white house&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i can share a conversation....monologue, really by a british co worker...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;have you seen this? that black guy, runnning for president? he &amp;#39;as oprah backing &amp;#39;im now, ha, it&amp;#39;ll bring &amp;#39;im way up in the polls...you know how they worship oprah in america&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i had to bite my tongue...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;looking forward to the next 12 months... &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:47:25 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tracya</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1044 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
