<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Sex In The Public Square - authority - Comments</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/900</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;authority&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Sex worker blog authority</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/535#comment-1103</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Gracie, thanks so much for linking to that post. I&amp;#39;ve been thinking a lot these days about what it means to have &amp;quot;authority&amp;quot; outside the mainstream media or academic circles, and it&amp;#39;s an interesting puzzle, but I think by focusing on the intended community of readers, as you do, and by focusing on tools like Technorati, as you do, you&amp;#39;re hitting the proverbial nail on the head.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scholars often judge the authority of a piece of research by how often it is cited by other researchers. This can be in a very very small field, so it isn&amp;#39;t about raw numbers, really. Tools like Alexa and Technorati do essentially the same kind of thing for bloggers: show how many times a piece is accessed, or how many links refer back to it. Again, the smallness of the interested community doesn&amp;#39;t necessarily diminish the authority of the piece.   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Those are not perfect indicators of course (lots of people might link to a very superficial piece just because it&amp;#39;s amusing, for example) and this also makes me think about the responsibility we have as interested writers/thinkers/bloggers/sex workers/etc. to be out there reading and commenting on each others&amp;#39;work. I know how easy it can be for me to forget that part as I focus on my own writing or other work, but those discussions are another way for readers to judge the authority of an original piece. It&amp;#39;s sort of akin to the kind of question/answer sessions after a research presentation, or the letters in response to a research article. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for raising these issues. They&amp;#39;re really important as we keep expanding the space -- online and off -- for discussion of sex-related issues! The workers at Bound, Not Gagged have done a great job at expanding that space, and I&amp;#39;m glad you drew more attention to Amanda&amp;#39;s post. Just the kind of thing that helps to build recognizable authority!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 07:21:20 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1103 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
