Home
  • About us
  • Calendar
  • THE PUBLIC SQUARE
  • Links
  • Search

Navigation

  • Track sex-related legislation (Safari-only right now)
  • Recent activity
  • Add Something New!

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

SPEAK OUT!!

Contact the Media

Be heard on the issues that matter most to you!

Our Feeds...

 Whole Site Feed

 Calendar Feed

 Comments Feed

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 2 guests online.
Home » Sex Act(ivism)!

End the Global Gag Rule for Good!

  • abortion
  • contraception
  • family planning
  • international aid
  • politics
  • reproductive freedom
  • reproductive health
Submitted by Elizabeth on 15 September 2007 - 1:06pm.

Wome's health clinic in Tanzania

A few days ago JanieBelle wrote about the Senate vote that would end the global gag rule if it isn't vetoed. A veto is a very real possibility, though. And before the President even has a chance to veto the bill, it has to get through a reconciliation conference with the House. NARAL Pro-Choice America is calling for 50,000 people to write to Congress to make sure that the gag rule repeal stays in the bill that goes to the President. That'll also help build a good base to organize an override of the veto if it becomes necessary.

The "global gag rule" essentially prevents any US aid money from going to foreign clinics or organizations that provide information about abortion as an option, or that provide abortions, even if the clinics or agencies use only their own money to provide those services and even f those services are perfectly legal where the agencies are located. Because of this rule, clinics and organizations in poor countries. are bound to either reject US aid, or deny women medical care.

Click here for the NARAL Pro-Choice America call for action, or use the "Speak Out!" link on the left to get contact info for your senators and representatives and let them know what you think.

 

Photo Women's Health Care Clinic, captioned, "Waiting extremely patiently for prenatal care, family planning, and basic OB-GYN services," by Advencap and found on Flickr. Licenced using Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike licence.

 

‹ Can you donate a box of condoms for sex workers in Chile?upIf you are in NYC on Thursday, please show your support for sex workers in Cambodia. ›
»
  • Printer-friendly version

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

May I?

Submitted by JanieBelle on 15 September 2007 - 2:53pm.

Elizabeth,

Thank you for the link love, for starters, and for posting this as well.

With your permission, I'd like to repost this in toto at UDoJ. 

May I?

  • reply

Of course you may

Submitted by Elizabeth on 15 September 2007 - 4:36pm.
That's the beauty of our Creative Commons "By Attribution, Non Commercial, Share Alike" license. UDOJ is still noncommercial, isn't it? Because otherwise you'd need special permission ;)
  • reply

Thank you

Submitted by JanieBelle on 15 September 2007 - 5:15pm.

Yes, UDoJ is also under the CCNCSA license (with one small exception, noted at the bottom of the right hand side bar).

I was pretty sure you would be OK with it, and I just wanted to get your permission first.

Kisses 

  • reply

The Difficulties of Activism

Submitted by Chris on 15 September 2007 - 5:00pm.

I must be getting old.

Activism like this gets harder and harder for me; much as my brain insists that actions like are necessary, and that I shouldn't surrender to the grip of apathy, it's harder to convince my heart that stuff like this will do anything. I don't think a veto is likely; I think it's certain, unless the Dems get together and make a real push that not only gets them a 2/3rds majority with which to overrrule the veto, but can stand up to the inevitable slanders that the Republicans will hit them with about how the Dems are a bunch of baby-killin' homos and whoremongers. Yeah, it's true that assaults like these are not only ironic but positively ludicrous in light of recent events, but they still work, partly because the Dems fear them so damn much. If more prominent Democrats, like say, Hillary Clinton, were willing to be unambiguous in their support for abortion rights as a good thing, I'd have more faith, but instead they spend their time pussyfooting around and try to triangulate a "third way" that will allow them to keep their base while not looking like they like this abortion thing too much.

In the end, the Republicans aren't the real enemy of liberals; it's the Democrats.

  • reply

I'm Feeling It

Submitted by JanieBelle on 15 September 2007 - 5:17pm.

Your pain, that is.  I've been utterly discouraged by the (lack of) Democratic actions since they've taken control of the Congress.

They had a resounding mandate to fix things, but have pissed it away.

I believe the word for which you may be reaching is "betrayal". 

  • reply

Betrayal?

Submitted by Chris on 15 September 2007 - 5:34pm.

I believe the word for which you may be reaching is "betrayal".

If I were feeling very, very polite, that would be the word I would grab for. Generally, my description of the situation would include a lot of very rude descriptions of anatomically impossible acts and speculations upon their lineage.

  • reply

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br /> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

This site powered by Drupal!


Unless otherwise marked, work on SexInThePublicSquare.org work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. Permission required for commercial uses.

Header image created by Jolene Collins using works that are public domain or licensed under Creative Commons Attribution, Noncommercial, Share-alike licenses. From left to right, images are credited to: Will Van Dorp, unknown origin found on Pawel Wojcik's "Grandfather's Girls", Richard Eriksson, Kaitlyn Tikkun. Background image by Robert Gourley