antiporn feminism

Is "Stop Porn Culture" Violating Porn Laws?
Submitted by Elizabeth on 12 July 2008 - 7:01pmSome thoughts on "Fair Use," 2257, and Stop Porn Culture's pornographic slide show
Stop Porn Culture is an organized effort on the part of a number of antiporn-feminist scholars and activists to convince people that pornography is harmful to society (and especially to girls and women) and to get them to swear off porn and to challenge other people's use of it.
Stop Porn Culture (SPC) is also a traveling porn exhibition. In fact, not only is it a traveling porn exhibition, it is a distributor of free pornographic images. Lots of them. Lots of the most hard core of them.
Some sex worker advocates that I respect tremendously, like Ren of Renegade Evolution and Blog for Pro Porn Activism (BPPA) are out there, dedicated and loud, calling SPC out on its failure to comply with a US law that distributors of pornography must follow. That law, known by its shorthand section number (2257) requires producers of pornography to maintain records of performers' identities and ages, and to make those records available for inspection by law enforcement officials. SPC does not do this. These advocates are also calling SPC out on its use of the copyrighted images without permission from the copyright owners or consent of those depicted in the images.
I sympathize. It is galling to watch SPC use the work of the people they most claim to despise, and to freely distribute images they think nobody else should be able to distribute. And it is especially galling to watch them talk about the exploitation and humiliation of the women in the images all the while continuing to humiliate those same women by publicly exposing in and then condemning their work.
![]()






Recent comments
2 days 18 hours ago
2 days 19 hours ago
4 days 3 hours ago
4 days 6 hours ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
2 weeks 2 hours ago
3 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 6 days ago
4 weeks 16 hours ago