<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>abortion</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/133</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>What the Coat Hanger Means</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/684</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One of the problems with politics is how words and images can slip from being portrayals of people&amp;#39;s lives into trite cliché so easily that you can&amp;#39;t even remember when the line was crossed. For example, take the coat hanger.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;img src=&quot;/files/images-imce/CoatHangerSlash-Small_0.gif&quot; alt=&quot;No Coat Hangers&quot; hspace=&quot;10&quot; vspace=&quot;10&quot; width=&quot;98&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;coat hanger has been the symbol of activists who work to keep abortion a viable choice for all women everywhere. It represents the bad old days, when abortion was illegal in many parts of the country, although being illegal never stopped it from happening. The coat hanger has become ubiquitous in the debate over abortion. So much so that its meaning seems to have become invisible.  It&amp;#39;s been over thirty years now since Roe V. Wade was first handed down, and a couple of generations have grown up and become sexually active with the choice of abortion as something that could be taken as granted. The coat hanger and the deaths and self-mutilations it represents has become part of our intellectual wallpaper, something that is so old and familiar that we barely think of it at all. When we do, many people are likely to see the coat hanger as more symbolic of earnest young activists wound up on idealism and hyperbole than as part of our history.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/684&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/684#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/133">abortion</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/27">news</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:04:46 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">684 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Access denied: A different kind of de facto segregation</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/elizabethsblog/access-denied</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/choice-action-center/bfc08-home.html&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/assets/graphics/bfc_day_button_200.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;blog for choice icon&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; height=&quot;123&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; It&amp;#39;s interesting that &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/choice-action-center/bfc08-home.html&quot;&gt;Blog for Choice&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; day falls right after Martin Luther King Jr&amp;#39;s holiday. It has me thinking about intersections and parallels of civil rights issues. For those who&amp;#39;ve studied segregation, the terms &amp;quot;de facto&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;de jure&amp;quot; are familiar. They mean &amp;quot;in fact&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;by law&amp;quot; and they are used to describe the reality of segregation in the United States today. Segregation in schools, for example, has been illegal since Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 yet there is a great deal of de facto segregation in American schools.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/elizabethsblog/access-denied&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/elizabethsblog/access-denied#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/133">abortion</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/18">activism</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/916">blog for choice</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/407">civil rights</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/917">pro choice</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:47:28 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">550 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Screening: &quot;I Had an Abortion&quot; (2005, 55 minutes)</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/532</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;$5 Suggested&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards&lt;br /&gt;Roe v. Wade is 35 years old this month. We&amp;#39;ll be celebrating, agitating, and planning for the future by screening Gillian Aldrich&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;I Had an Abortion&amp;quot; and hosting a discussion with Jennifer Baumgardner, Amy Richards and other folks from the Third Wave Foundation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/133">abortion</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/894">amy richards</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/893">jennifer baumgardner</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/194">New York</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:03:52 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">532 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Verizon to its customers: NARAL 2 CNTRVSL 4 U</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/419</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm1.static.flickr.com/83/218173154_2b6c73acb9_m.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;text message&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; height=&quot;180&quot; width=&quot;240&quot; /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/us/27verizon.html?ex=1348632000&amp;amp;en=a1232dee7638e939&amp;amp;ei=5124&amp;amp;partner=permalink&amp;amp;exprod=permalink&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The New York Times reports this morning that Verizon has rejected a proposal by Naral Pro-Choice America to use its network for sending text messages to people who sign up for them&lt;/a&gt;. Other cell phone networks have accepted the proposal which allows subscribers to sign up to receive text message updates from NARAL. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to a communication with Verizon that &lt;a href=&quot;http://naral.org/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;NARAL &lt;/a&gt; gave to the times, the company&amp;#39;s policy is to reject proposals from groups that “promote an agenda or distribute content that, in its [Verizon&amp;#39;s] discretion, may be seen as controversial or unsavory to any of our users.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are at least three very troubling pieces of this rationale. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/419&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/419#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/133">abortion</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/18">activism</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/281">censorship</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/732">NARAL</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/731">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 05:33:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">419 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>End the Global Gag Rule for Good!</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/396</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1041/531225635_b60e99aedc.jpg?v=0&quot; alt=&quot;Wome&#039;s health clinic in Tanzania&quot; align=&quot;bottom&quot; height=&quot;334&quot; width=&quot;500&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A few days ago &lt;a href=&quot;/node/383&quot;&gt;JanieBelle wrote about the Senate vote that would end the global gag rule if it isn&amp;#39;t vetoed&lt;/a&gt;. A veto is a very real possibility, though. And before the President even has a chance to veto the bill, it has to get through a reconciliation conference with the House. NARAL Pro-Choice America is calling for 50,000 people to write to Congress to make sure that the gag rule repeal stays in the bill that goes to the President. That&amp;#39;ll also help build a good base to organize an override of the veto if it becomes necessary. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/396&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/396#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/133">abortion</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/134">contraception</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/688">family planning</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/689">international aid</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/39">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/212">reproductive freedom</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/546">reproductive health</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:06:54 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">396 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Congress Votes to Repeal Global Gag Rule</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/383</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/babasteve/3734341/&quot; title=&quot;Zimbabwe 1, by babasteve @ Flickr&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm1.static.flickr.com/3/3734341_6766d5b6c6.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Zimbabwe 1, by babasteve @ Flickr&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; hspace=&quot;15&quot; vspace=&quot;15&quot; width=&quot;250&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;A great big peek above our garters to &lt;a href=&quot;/user/2&quot; title=&quot;Chris @ SitPS&quot;&gt;Chris&lt;/a&gt; at SitPS for &lt;a href=&quot;/node/381&quot; title=&quot;Chris Calls for Help for Heather&quot;&gt;pointing us to Heather&lt;/a&gt;, and to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scarleteen.com/user/heather&quot; title=&quot;Heather @ Scarleteen&quot;&gt;Heather at Scarleteen&lt;/a&gt; for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scarleteen.com/blog/heather/2007/09/08/global_gag_rule_repealed&quot; title=&quot;Global Gag Rule Repealed&quot;&gt;pointing us to this&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2007/09/07/congress-votes-to-repeal-global-gag-rule&quot; title=&quot;Congress Votes to Repeal Global Gag Rule&quot;&gt;Via Tod Preston at RHRealityCheck&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Last night, despite President Bush&amp;#39;s veto threat, the Senate passed the FY 2008 State-Foreign Operations Appropriations bill (by a vote of 81-12) that includes significant provisions overturning destructive policies on family planning and HIV/AIDS. Thanks to the leadership and commitment of Senators Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Barbara Boxer (D-CA), the Senate bill not only includes the identical measures in the House-passed bill (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.02764:&quot;&gt;H.R. 2764&lt;/a&gt;) -- exempting contraceptives from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.popact.org/Publications/Fact_Sheets/FS5/Summary.shtml&quot;&gt;Global Gag Rule&lt;/a&gt; and repealing the abstinence-only funding restrictions for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.popact.org/Publications/Fact_Sheets/FS25/Summary.shtml&quot;&gt;HIV prevention programs&lt;/a&gt; -- it goes even further by repealing the Gag Rule entirely.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/383&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/383#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/133">abortion</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/88">abstinence only</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/39">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/26">sex</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:29:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JanieBelle</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">383 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bringing Abortion Out of the Closet</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/311</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
It looks like the Catholic League is slithering out of the closet again.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Catholic League is the worst of the worst who represent the Catholic Church.  Ideologically, they hail from the bad old days, when everyone named Goldberg or Lieberman had hands that were literally, &lt;em&gt;personally&lt;/em&gt; considered to be soaked in the blood of Christ.  The League has been an active force in trying to suppress art and expression that they considered to be &quot;anti-Catholic,&quot; which is defined extremely broadly.  The sheer slavering paranoia of the Catholic League on virtually all fronts of the &quot;culture wars&quot; can be summed up by a single, infamous quote by League President William Donohue from an appearance on &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200412210001&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Scarborough Country&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200412210001&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; in 2004&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/311&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/311#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/133">abortion</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/18">activism</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/250">Anti-Choice</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/380">media</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/114">New York City</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/283">religion</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 02:03:51 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">311 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Gonzales v. Carhart</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/102</link>
 <description>Gonzales v. Carhart was decided by the US Supreme Court in 2007 and represents the first time that the US Supreme Court has allowed a state law criminalizing an abortion procedure. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.wordpress.com/tag/gonzales-v-carhart/&quot;&gt;Click here&lt;/a&gt;  for sexinthepublicsquare.wordpress.com posts discussing the case.) </description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/102#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/133">abortion</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/206">Court cases</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/213">Gonzales v. Carhart</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/210">US Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:55:11 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">102 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Roe v. Wade</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/101</link>
 <description>Roe v. Wade was decided by the US Supreme Court in 1973 and declared unconstitutional state laws that criminalized abortion before fetal viability.</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/101#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/133">abortion</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/206">Court cases</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/212">reproductive freedom</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/211">Roe v. Wade</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/210">US Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:21:23 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">101 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sex Ed(itorials) in the New York Times</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/75</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Two sex-oriented op-ed pieces in one weekend!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On Saturday &lt;a href=&quot;http://select.nytimes.com/2007/05/19/opinion/19gawand.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Atul Gawande wrote&lt;/a&gt; about how we as individualas and communities need to take greater &amp;quot;do it yourself&amp;quot; responsibility for creating an environment in which people can educate themselves about contraception , pregnancy, and talk openly about their own sexual practices. Click &lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/do-it-ourselves-abortion-reduction-policy/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; to read my discussion of his piece. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/75&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/75#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/133">abortion</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/134">contraception</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/136">marriage</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/86">New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/73">same-sex marriage</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/26">sex</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/106">Sex Ed(itorials)</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/137">spousal benefits</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/135">unintended pregnancy</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 13:22:53 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">75 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
