<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Court cases</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/206</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>United States v. Williams (2008 internet child pornography case)</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/673</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;US Supreme Court upholds §2252A(a)(3)(B) prohibiting offering or soliciting &amp;quot;any material or purported material in a manner that reflects the belief, or that is intended to cause another to believe that the material is illegal child pornography.&amp;quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_06_694/&quot;&gt;http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_06_694/&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/673#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/1050">child pornography</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/206">Court cases</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/422">internet</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:49:41 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">673 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Varnum v. Brien</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/365</link>
 <description>The Polk County District Court decision that ruled that Iowa&amp;#39;s state law restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples was unconstitutional. Related documents are also listed on the page.</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/365#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/206">Court cases</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/648">Iowa</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/73">same-sex marriage</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:39:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">365 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Eisenstadt v. Baird</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/171</link>
 <description>In 1972 the US Supreme Court decides that laws criminalizing the distribution of contraception to unmarried people are unconstitutional. </description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/171#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/431">birth control</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/134">contraception</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/206">Court cases</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/432">privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/210">US Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:45:12 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">171 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Griswold v. Connecticut</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/170</link>
 <description>In 1965 the US Supreme Court finds that laws prohibiting the distribution of contraception to married people violates people&amp;#39;s rights to privacy. </description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/170#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/431">birth control</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/134">contraception</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/206">Court cases</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/432">privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/210">US Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:41:20 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">170 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Gonzales v. Carhart</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/102</link>
 <description>Gonzales v. Carhart was decided by the US Supreme Court in 2007 and represents the first time that the US Supreme Court has allowed a state law criminalizing an abortion procedure. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.wordpress.com/tag/gonzales-v-carhart/&quot;&gt;Click here&lt;/a&gt;  for sexinthepublicsquare.wordpress.com posts discussing the case.) </description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/102#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/133">abortion</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/206">Court cases</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/213">Gonzales v. Carhart</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/210">US Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:55:11 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">102 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Roe v. Wade</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/101</link>
 <description>Roe v. Wade was decided by the US Supreme Court in 1973 and declared unconstitutional state laws that criminalized abortion before fetal viability.</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/101#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/133">abortion</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/206">Court cases</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/212">reproductive freedom</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/211">Roe v. Wade</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/210">US Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:21:23 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">101 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Loving v. Virginia</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/100</link>
 <description>Loving v. Virginia was decided by the US Supreme Court in 1967, and it declared unconstitutional state laws making interracial marriage illegal.</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/100#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/206">Court cases</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/209">interracial marriage</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/198">Loving v. Virginia</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/208">racism</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/210">US Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:16:49 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">100 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
