<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>health</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/38</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Run like a girl</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/ElizabethsBlog/run-like-a-girl</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;You run like a girl.&amp;quot; It was an insult aimed at boys. Being &amp;quot;like a girl&amp;quot; was clearly a bad thing for a boy to be if he wanted to be an athlete. Not being enough &amp;quot;like a girl&amp;quot; on the other hand, is devastating for women.
&lt;p&gt;It was not so long ago that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://olympic.org&quot;&gt;International Olympic Committee&lt;/a&gt;  (IOC) used to require all women athletes to be tested to discover whether they were &amp;#39;truly women&amp;#39; or not. [Bracket, please, for a moment the question of what a &amp;#39;true woman&amp;#39; might be. We&amp;#39;ll come back to it. I promise.] Now such tests are only performed, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/sports/olympics/30gender.html?ex=1375156800&amp;amp;en=da490a538658cbb2&amp;amp;ei=5124&amp;amp;partner=permalink&amp;amp;exprod=permalink&quot; title=&quot;the story in today&amp;#039;s New York Times&quot;&gt;the story in today&amp;#39;s New York Times&lt;/a&gt;, when a woman athlete&amp;#39;s sex is questioned. [Bracket for a moment why this never, apparently, comes up in men&amp;#39;s sports.] What would cause her sex to be questioned? &lt;em&gt;The Times&lt;/em&gt; does not present a list of specific suspicious indicators, but does say that it has come up in the context of doping tests. What is so striking about this is that it represents an insistence that women be held to a biological standard of womanhood. Consider the variations among women. What does it mean to set aside some group of women and say they are too powerful to be &amp;#39;real women&amp;#39;? Consider how this makes even less sense when we are talking about women who represent the strongest, fastest, most agile, most physically powerful women in the world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/ElizabethsBlog/run-like-a-girl&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/ElizabethsBlog/run-like-a-girl#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/593">gender</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/38">health</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/1104">intersex</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/1106">Olympics</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/26">sex</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/1105">sports</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/127">transgender</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:45:21 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">713 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>But will Medicare pay for lube?</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/ElizabethsBlog/But-will-Medicare-pay-for-lube</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://farm1.static.flickr.com/46/148796577_dfda27c03a_m.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm1.static.flickr.com/46/148796577_dfda27c03a_m.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;drawing &amp;quot;Penis Pump&amp;quot;&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; height=&quot;240&quot; width=&quot;168&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; You might have missed the part about the penis pumps. It was in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/30/business/30golden.html?_r=1&amp;amp;pagewanted=all&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;New York Times article about Medicare overpaying for things like oxygen tanks&lt;/a&gt;. Apparently Medicare, despite its potentially enormous bargaining power, spends more for many items than they would cost in your neighborhood pharmacy or surgical supply store. In the midst of the article is this paragraph:   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt; For example, last year Medicare spent more than $21 million on pumps to help older and disabled men attain erections, paying about $450 for the same device that is available online for as little as $108. Even for a simple walking cane, which can be purchased online for about $11, the government pays $20, according to government data.   &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/ElizabethsBlog/But-will-Medicare-pay-for-lube&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/ElizabethsBlog/But-will-Medicare-pay-for-lube#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/488">age and sexuality</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/656">government</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/38">health</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/861">Medicare</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/27">news</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/39">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/476">sex education</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:56:40 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">510 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Prevention bill(s)* still stuck in committee while Democrats increase abstinence-only funds</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/ElizabethsBlog/Prevention-bill-still-stuck-in-committee-while-Democrats-increase-Abstinence-Only-Funds</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=230939358&amp;amp;size=s&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm1.static.flickr.com/82/230939358_de6cc395cd_m.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;The Condom Police sign&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; height=&quot;240&quot; width=&quot;180&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; File this under &amp;quot;with friends like these...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; What has happened to the Prevention First Act (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.00819:&quot;&gt;H.R. 819&lt;/a&gt;/&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:SN00021:&quot;&gt;S. 21&lt;/a&gt;)? Why are these bills stuck in committee while the Democrats are INCREASING funding for abstinence-only education? Don&amp;#39;t they at least have an obligation to hold the line on such misappropriate of funds? We&amp;#39;re talking about the spending of 141 million dollars on programs that we know don&amp;#39;t work and that actually put our communities at risk. And we&amp;#39;re talking about the party in control, the one that is supposed to be friendly to smart sexual health policy, granting this increase in spending and as a result teaching kids that abstinence-until-marriage is the only legitimate approach to sexuality and that condoms don&amp;#39;t work well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/ElizabethsBlog/Prevention-bill-still-stuck-in-committee-while-Democrats-increase-Abstinence-Only-Funds&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/ElizabethsBlog/Prevention-bill-still-stuck-in-committee-while-Democrats-increase-Abstinence-Only-Funds#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/88">abstinence only</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/508">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/38">health</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/552">news and politics</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/476">sex education</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/386">sexuality</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 17:45:15 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">474 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>National Association of People With AIDS</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/159</link>
 <description>NAPWA advocates on behalf of all people living with HIV and AIDS.  Their site includes publications, resources for People With AIDS, and testing information.</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/159#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/117">advocacy</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/55">Advocacy Organizations</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/408">AIDS</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/38">health</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/409">nationwide</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/59">Sexuality Research and Information</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:45:53 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">159 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Should baby boys be routinely circumcised?</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/11</link>
 <description>* No, unless in response to a true medical problem.\n* Yes, its okay for religious reasons but not &quot;just so he can look like his father&quot;\n* Yes, parents should be able to do whatever they&#039;re most comfortable with.\n* I don&#039;t know. I&#039;m confused about the whole circumcision thing.\n* \n</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/11#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/70">circumcision</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/38">health</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 14:50:53 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">11 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
