<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>bodies</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/385</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Because mastectomy should never be an outpatient procedure!</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/429</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For at least 10 years &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.house.gov/delauro/&quot;&gt;Rosa DeLauro&lt;/a&gt;  (D-CT) has been trying to get legislation passed in Congress that would mandate insurance companies to pay for at least two nights of hospitalization for women having mastectomies. She has introduced her bill, called the Breast Cancer Patient Protection Act, five times. Each time it has been consigned to languish in committees. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This year she has agan reintroduced the bill. It is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-758&quot;&gt;HR 758&lt;/a&gt;   this time around, and again it has been assigned to several committees. In fact, here&amp;#39;s the list of committees to which it has been referred before action can be taken:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/429&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/429#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/18">activism</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/385">bodies</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/741">Breast Cancer Patient Protection Act of 2007</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/742">HR. 758</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/739">medical</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/743">S. 459</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/33">women</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 01:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">429 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NYC spends $29,000 to arrest a topless woman</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/146</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19293933/from/ET/&quot;&gt;This from the AP&lt;/a&gt;  (sent by &lt;a href=&quot;http://tugster.wordpress.com&quot;&gt;Will&lt;/a&gt;  who saw it on MSNBC and is always generous in sharing “can you believe this madness type stories.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It seems that despite an appeals court ruling 15 years ago that determined women have the right to be shirtless anywhere men are allowed to be shirtless, the New York City police arrested a woman, Jill Coccaro, (now known as Phoenix Feeley) two years ago for “indecent exposure” when she walked topless in public.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She was held for 12 hours before she was released and told she would not be prosecuted. She claims that during that time she was treated roughly and also taken for a mental health exam.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So if you’re shirtless in public and you’re female you must be crazy? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/146&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/146#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/385">bodies</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/388">breasts</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/387">gender equality</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/355">NYC</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:55:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">146 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Contribute to The Foreskin Dialogues!</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/20</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I began asking people at &lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.wordpress.com&quot;&gt;SexInThePublicSquare.Wordpress.Com&lt;/a&gt;  to participate in a discussion of male genitals. Specifically, &amp;quot;The Foreskin Dialogues&amp;quot; seeks to get a sense of the range of feelings people have about circumcision. I&amp;#39;ve now moved this project to the forums here. If you would like to contribute, &lt;a href=&quot;/node/99&quot;&gt;click here to visit the &amp;quot;Foreskin Dialogues&amp;quot; forum!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/20#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/385">bodies</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/70">circumcision</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/383">foreskin</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/384">penis</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:02:22 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
