<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>women&amp;#039;s health</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/545</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Female Condom Gets a Makeover</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/487</link>
 <description>The female condom has kind of been like the Betamax of safer sex.  Despite its debut being heralded with a lot of hype and hopes, it never caught on, either in the United States or elsewhere.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/13/health/13cond.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ref=health&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot; id=&quot;agdt&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Now the makers have redesigned it&quot;&gt;Now the makers have redesigned it&lt;/a&gt;, hoping that it&amp;#39;ll live up to its potential the second time around.  I do know women who like the female condom: at least two have told me that they didn&amp;#39;t like using it unless they were serious about a guy, because it felt much more intimate than a regular condom.  But no matter what they do with the shape and design, I don&amp;#39;t think that the female condom&amp;#39;s ever going to become competitive unless they can do something about the price, which has always been up around $4 per female condom as opposed to .50 to $1.00 for the old-fashioned kind.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/487&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/487#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/378">condoms</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/134">contraception</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/quickies">quickies</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/795">safer sex</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/545">women&amp;#039;s health</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:00:35 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">487 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Reproductive Health Reality Check</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/291</link>
 <description>Fact sheets, detailed commentary on policy and legislation, and checks on the &amp;quot;reckless rhetoric&amp;quot; that sometimes prevails in the debates over important issues of reproducitve health.</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/291#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/207">Legislation and Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/484">Health care</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/212">reproductive freedom</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/546">reproductive health</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/545">women&amp;#039;s health</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:48:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">291 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
