<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Sex crimes</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/6</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Thomas Beckett and Elliot Spitzer</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/758</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thomas Beckett:  Archbishop of Canterbury and Justice in America.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does a question generally considered to speak to Church and State have any connection with jurisprudence and concepts of equal justice?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the 12th Century, Henry II ruled an empire from England across the south and west of what is now France (Aquitaine).  By Divine Right, this King of England was the law in every aspect of life.  Every aspect save one.  The other power in this empire was the Catholic Church.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Henry II ruled with the able hand of his lifelong friend and Lord High Chancellor Thomas Beckett.  Even these two powerful men could not hold sway over the dominion controlled by the Church.  Crimes and misdemeanors committed in the realm met with the justice of Henry’s court; unless a person holding office within the Church committed that crime.  In that case, the Church held authority.  More, Henry ruled every aspect of his own life, until it crossed a line of sacrament.  There, Henry’s primacy bowed to the primacy of the Church.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/758&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/758#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/6">Sex crimes</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/1154">ESpitzer</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/1155">Foley</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/656">government</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/232">justice</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/104">prostitution</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/1157">Registry</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/26">sex</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/220">sex crimes</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/1156">Sex Offender</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/1158">unequal justice</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:24:26 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">758 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rational sex offender rules</title>
 <link>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/9</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What kinds of prohibitions should there be on where registered sex offenders can live? Should sex offender registries even be used? What kinds of classifications should they contain? It seems we often make policy about sex offenders based on fear or in reaction to a horrific crime, and not based on a reasoned approach to the problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/9&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/node/9#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/6">Sex crimes</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/31">residential restrictions</category>
 <category domain="http://sexinthepublicsquare.org/taxonomy/term/30">sex offenders</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 10:02:51 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">9 at http://sexinthepublicsquare.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
